Website © 2014 Ronald Douglas Kennedy. All Rights Reserved.                                             Site designed by Undisclosed

Exhibit 13

Pelican Hill Road

Irvine Coast Land Use Plan Amendment




A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H
I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P
Q  R  S  T  U  V  W
X  Y  Z

Notes on Maps
and Text Exhibits

click here

Requires FREE
Adobe Reader



[Map 1]

Pelican Hill Road/Newport Coast Drive OVERVIEW

[Maps 2A & 2B]

Proposed Pelican Hill Road Alignment

[Map 3]

Road shown going from Pacific Coast Highway to MacArthur Boulevard

[Map 4]

The Irvine Company grand opening of Newport Coast Drive

[Map 5]

Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA)/Coastal Commission approval of realignment of Ford Rd.

[Letter 5B-1 & 5B-2]

[Letter 5C-1–5C-3]

A.G. asking for the CCC approval of TCA putting a Toll on Newport Coast Drive

[Map 6]

Thomas map showing how the 73 toll road has consumed Newport Coast Drive, tolls fraudulently collected daily

[Map 7]

The EIR graphically shows that a toll booth will be placed at the intersection with Newport Coast Drive (using the old name Pelican Hills Rd.)



[FNCD 1]

December 19, 1980 City Of Newport Beach Transportation Plan Citizens Advisory Committee

[FNCD 2]

May 19, 1987 Draft Environmental Report For Pelican Hill Road Irvine Coast

[FNCD 3]

Cover letter from A.G.’s Office regarding my request for a TCA Exhibit

[FNCD 4]

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Ramp Transaction Summary, received from the TCA July 27, 2012

[FNCD 5]

Cover letter from A.G.’s Office. This is TCA exhibit 7

[FNCD 6]

January 7, 1994 Gilbert W. Ferguson Assemblyman Seventh District, Newport Beach. regarding his Opinion request.

[FNCD 7]

March 17, 2012 letter to the honorable Dr. Charles Lester, Executive Director, California Coastal Commission

[FNCD 8]

December 9, 1993. Gilbert W. Ferguson, Assemblyman Seventh District, Newport Beach—his first request for an A.G. Opinion

[FNCD 9]

5/13/93 approved, California Coastal Commission: “Revised Proposed Findings”

[FNCD 10]

December 20,1993 from Newport Beach Council Member for Corona Del Mar, writes to the Honorable Dan Lungren, Attorney General

[FNCD 11]

California Coastal Commission letter April 27, 2012

[FNCD 12]

6/26/92—TCA/LSA Associates, Inc.: Irvine Coast CDP (Coastal Development Permit) findings

[FNCD 13]

A.G. Conflicts-of-interest

[FNCD 14]

Capitol Weekly: “The California Coastal Commission—Unrepentant Sinners”

[FNCD 15]

State of California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General: Legal Opinions & Quo Warranto

[FNCD 16]

March 3, 2009 letter from the A.G.’s Office

[FNCD 17]


[FNCD 18]

Letter to Department of Justice, December 4, 2012—still looking for the missing A.G. Maiser report

[FNCD 19]

Orange County Resolution, NO. 82-598 Transportation Corridors Development Policy

[FNCD 20]

Newport Coast Local Coastal Program, Second Amendment, December 3, 1996

[FNCD 21]

Annexation and Development Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company, 11-08-2001

[FNCD 22]

California Coastal Commission, August 18, 1995—Mr. Charles Damm, District Director, from the San Diego office

[FNCD 23]

October 15, 1985. Resolution of The Board Of Supervisors of Orange County, California, Resolution No. 85-1477, Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program

[FNCD 24]

April 20, 1988. Resolution of the Board of Supervisors, Orange County, No. 88-537

[FNCD 25]

April 20, 1988. Resolution of the Board of Supervisors Orange County, Resolution No. 88-538

SECTION I, page 2


5. B 2. page 2. [ top left 11] bottom left. At F. " Applicant's Consistency Certification. TCA has certified that the proposed activity complies with California's approved coastal management program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program."

NOTE. As late as the CCC. "Approval & Findings " of this Consistency Certification date 5-13-93. For the TCA was not showing the California Coastal Commission or public, any later plan to move and put a toll on Newport Coast Drive.

Also, Newport Coast Drive. Is shown visually, and spelled out, going to MacArthur Boulevard on 5 and 5 -A 1. in these 5-13-93 signed off "approved" CCC documentation's.

5. C 1 to 5. C 3. dated from September 5, 2007. Till January 12, 2012 .After repeated request for the TCA. CCC. toll way approval, taking Newport Coast Drive and, and putting a toll on it . From the A. G. office. I was never given the TCA Approval. Told they did not have any records . A. G. Letter September 5, 2007. 5C1

Was the reason it would confirm & show Newport Coast Drive was approved by the CCC, and showing a connection to MacArthur Boulevard, not as a toll road, but a free public road.. As is shown above. [ these pieces of this puzzle were fitted together by the date 5-13-93. in researching documents for this request, for a Federal, Contract Trial. ]

Map 6.  [Where are the missing map's and CCC call-outs to approve what happened in 1997?]

Newport Coast Drive, diverted to the San Joaquin Hills Toll Transportation Corridor for collecting , toll tax. And is not in compliance with the CCC and O. C. 1988 Irvine Coast Development Agreement. "Contract of, June 9, 1988". This Map also shows the new Z designed by-pass most likely paid for by public taxes, located at Bonita Canyon DR. The original By-Pass Newport Coast Drive, was not amended or altered: or approved in new open Public Coastal Commission LCP. amendment Findings hearings. For amending the "June 1988 Irvine Coast Development "Public Contract".There were no LCP amending public hearings. to alter the LCP, Mitigation Finding's , as called out. That the The Irvine Company TIC built and gave, to resolve this traffic bottle neck

The Z. route is not equal, and driver's have elected to use MacArthur Blvd and Pacific Coast Highway again. Bringing back additional traffic congestion. This has altered the traffic relief as bargained for in the LCP. By-Pass, traffic mitigation benefits, for the Public and Corona Del Mar. As these drivers also have elected with there wallets, it's not equal, And also they will not pay the Toll Tax. But are again using MacArthur Boulevard and Pacific Coast highway again. As of June 20, 2012. some of the Public has paid the Toll Agency $49,672,107.00 Which is the original financial force, behind this clear daily increasing toll fraud, on the driving public. who are paying to use the faster, almost original Newport Coast Drive, direct route.

MAP 7. The TCA opines, now the public well understood that a toll was going to be placed on Newport Coast Drive [ NCD 30 ] at page 6. also there voluminous EIS [ NCD 25 ] did not clearly, tell the public of their plans. in the only reference page about tolling, on figure "2.5 Toll Plaza Locations" Map. [ Map 7 ] dated EIS Dated 1992. TCA give no text, of their desire to toll Newport Coast Dr. just a snake eyed Map, and using the old road name, not in use in 1992.

more information on this at Frauds, 3. and G. and R. below.

Note also this EIS is calling out the wrong road name. The Pelican Hill name had changed [ NCD 32 ] dated 1991 as a free LCP, By-Pass Road known to the public as Newport Coast Drive. the TCA is wrong again, the public did not, well understand. If the public miss putting enough money in the toll bucket, they are fined. But the TCA takes a free public by-pass road link, and, and charges millions of dollars and

Now for the past, hidden: omissions, fraudulent history from the beginning to the end, and the confusing middle. As the fraud's, and omissions unfold. Leading to the toll tax paid by some the public daily.


1.----- California Attorney Generals A. G. Office, fraudulently deletes two Questions asked by Assemblyman Gilbert W. Ferguson, seventh district Newport Beach. In his request to the A .G. for the Opinion. The A. G. failed showing all his eight questions, for answer's. As he originally shows printed on his official blue, Assemblyman letter head, "Assembly California Legislature" dated, January 7, 1994

[ FNCD 6 ]
The A. G. Office, shows two alteration's "missing from the original". Now on their fraudulent reprint of the Assemblyman's letter. Now printed on A. G. letter head dated, February 10, 1994. [ NCD 17 ] Notification: "We have received a revised request from Assemblyman Gilbert Ferguson for an opinion of the Attorney General on the following questions: "

The A. G. Office, deleted his wording in question two. "California State Coastal Commission"
[ that would have required the A. G. Office by law, to recuse itself from doing this opinion as they are also the lead Lawyers for the California Coastal Commission. As a clear conflict of interest]. As later the A. G. will rule in their opinion 93-1205
[ NCD A ] at page 6. foot note 7. " that placing a toll booth at Newport Coast Drive will not violate any requirements imposed under the California Coastal Act of 1976".
Which attempts to deny the public any Local Coastal Plan, LCP road mitigation By-Pass traffic rights.

The A. G. also Deleted all of question eight. As the Assemblyman asked "During the process wherein these roads were abandoned and conveyed to the SJHT or subsequently. Was or has there been any illegal attempt, by elected or appointed officials of the County or SQHTC or their employees or agents, to hide or obfuscate the act from the public?" Note; on Gilbert Ferguson Assemblyman's letter head it also states, " Commissioner Little Hover Commission." This honorable past combat Marine was right on point.
[ at P. below there's more ]

2----- February 3, 1994 [ NCD 11 ] California Coastal Commission. San Diego Office, District Director, MR. Charles Damm sends out a Fraudulent "staff " researched, Letter, to MR. Benjamin B. Nolan, City of Newport Beach Public Works Director, then this letter is forwarded to the A. G. for their opinion stating, "staff has concluded" ----"the portion of Newport Coast Drive, where a toll is proposed is not in the Coastal zone".----"or the Coastal Development Permit. Our research shows no such tie". Then this letter Quote, is cited in the A. G. Opinion May 12, 1994. [ NCD A ] , in foot note 7. in denying any free LCP. By-Pass Road rights for the driving public. And legitimizing the toll, For the TCA.

Note: This MR. Charles Damm letter is mailed out just seven days before the A. G. office mails out their, fraudulent doctored altered Opinion request to the public for comments February 10, 1994. [ NCD 17 ] We have received a revised request" The fix is heavy handed but in play now, with these two moves. the MR. Damm letter was copied to one City Council Man, the general public was blind sided, with no warning to comment on this new devastating LCP. interpretation by the, California Coastal Commission Director, MR. Charles Damm. His omission in not enforcing the Irvine Coast Development LCP. Findings, in section C. and D. is not truly revealed at this time. [look at capital M. and N. below for more information.]

August 18, 1995 [ FNCD 22 ] California Coastal Commission. Letter to me, [Ronald Kennedy] from MR. Charles Damm, District Director. San Diego Coast Area. A Federal Judge, needs to read this also, and decide what the LCP. and Public Contract call-outs, rights are. For the, Irvine Coast Development Agreement, County of Orange as recorded, June 9, 1988. Now also a Public Contract, of public LCP traffic mitigation rights.

page 1. "Second, regarding the issue of a portion of Newport Coast Drive becoming a toll road, once again our staff has reviewed the available information, including your letter, and our conclusion is that we do not have jurisdiction over the matter. You are correct in stating that the Commission approved the construction of Newport Coast Drive and the Irvine Coast LCP. However, neither of those actions and documents included in the submittals address the question of Newport Coast Drive possibly having a toll road component. The documents are silent in that

...continued, page 3


A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H
I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P
Q  R  S  T  U  V  W
X  Y  Z