Website © 2014 Ronald Douglas Kennedy. All Rights Reserved.                                             Site designed by Undisclosed

Home SECTION I SECTION II, Items B,C,D SECTION III, Items N,O,P SECTION IV--Map & Text Notes

Exhibit 13

Pelican Hill Road

Irvine Coast Land Use Plan Amendment

QUICK LINKS

SECTIONS

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H
I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P
Q  R  S  T  U  V  W
X  Y  Z

Notes on Maps
and Text Exhibits

click here

Requires FREE
Adobe Reader



MAPS

[Map 1]

Pelican Hill Road/Newport Coast Drive OVERVIEW

[Maps 2A & 2B]

Proposed Pelican Hill Road Alignment

[Map 3]

Road shown going from Pacific Coast Highway to MacArthur Boulevard

[Map 4]

The Irvine Company grand opening of Newport Coast Drive

[Map 5]

Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA)/Coastal Commission approval of realignment of Ford Rd.

[Letter 5B-1 & 5B-2]

[Letter 5C-1–5C-3]

A.G. asking for the CCC approval of TCA putting a Toll on Newport Coast Drive

[Map 6]

Thomas map showing how the 73 toll road has consumed Newport Coast Drive, tolls fraudulently collected daily

[Map 7]

The EIR graphically shows that a toll booth will be placed at the intersection with Newport Coast Drive (using the old name Pelican Hills Rd.)

 

TEXT

[FNCD 1]

December 19, 1980 City Of Newport Beach Transportation Plan Citizens Advisory Committee

[FNCD 2]

May 19, 1987 Draft Environmental Report For Pelican Hill Road Irvine Coast

[FNCD 3]

Cover letter from A.G.’s Office regarding my request for a TCA Exhibit

[FNCD 4]

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Ramp Transaction Summary, received from the TCA July 27, 2012

[FNCD 5]

Cover letter from A.G.’s Office. This is TCA exhibit 7

[FNCD 6]

January 7, 1994 Gilbert W. Ferguson Assemblyman Seventh District, Newport Beach. regarding his Opinion request.

[FNCD 7]

March 17, 2012 letter to the honorable Dr. Charles Lester, Executive Director, California Coastal Commission

[FNCD 8]

December 9, 1993. Gilbert W. Ferguson, Assemblyman Seventh District, Newport Beach—his first request for an A.G. Opinion

[FNCD 9]

5/13/93 approved, California Coastal Commission: “Revised Proposed Findings”

[FNCD 10]

December 20,1993 from Newport Beach Council Member for Corona Del Mar, writes to the Honorable Dan Lungren, Attorney General

[FNCD 11]

California Coastal Commission letter April 27, 2012

[FNCD 12]

6/26/92—TCA/LSA Associates, Inc.: Irvine Coast CDP (Coastal Development Permit) findings

[FNCD 13]

A.G. Conflicts-of-interest

[FNCD 14]

Capitol Weekly: “The California Coastal Commission—Unrepentant Sinners”

[FNCD 15]

State of California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General: Legal Opinions & Quo Warranto

[FNCD 16]

March 3, 2009 letter from the A.G.’s Office

[FNCD 17]

 

[FNCD 18]

Letter to Department of Justice, December 4, 2012—still looking for the missing A.G. Maiser report

[FNCD 19]

Orange County Resolution, NO. 82-598 Transportation Corridors Development Policy

[FNCD 20]

Newport Coast Local Coastal Program, Second Amendment, December 3, 1996

[FNCD 21]

Annexation and Development Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company, 11-08-2001

[FNCD 22]

California Coastal Commission, August 18, 1995—Mr. Charles Damm, District Director, from the San Diego office

[FNCD 23]

October 15, 1985. Resolution of The Board Of Supervisors of Orange County, California, Resolution No. 85-1477, Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program

[FNCD 24]

April 20, 1988. Resolution of the Board of Supervisors, Orange County, No. 88-537

[FNCD 25]

April 20, 1988. Resolution of the Board of Supervisors Orange County, Resolution No. 88-538

…continued in
SECTION II

SECTION I, page 4

 

page 2. " The Irvine Coast Development Agreement serves as an implementation mechanism for "The Irvine Coast Local Coastal Program", as adopted by the County of Orange Board of Supervisors on December 2, 1987. and certified by the California Coastal Commission on January 14, 1988."

The Development agreement caries out the CCC. LCP call-outs, And the CCC agrees the Development Agreement call out the LCP, Goals and Mitigation, for Public Benefits, specifically for this project, RDK.

page 3. direct call outs, 4 of 6 Is the key, Why was it not followed? " Provide early construction of four lanes of Pelican Hill Road from Pacific Coast Highway to Mac Arthur Boulevard."

At 5 of 6.. "Archive maximum compatibility with the preferred alignment of the future San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor." At this time the Corridor was to be funded by Developer's, Building Permits.

And Further spelled out in, [ FNCD 25 ] O. C. Resolution April 20, 1988 No. 88-538 " To authorize execution of the Irvine Coast -1- Planned Community Development Agreement No. 87-16"

page 1. " the use of a development agreement for implementation of the LCP was an integral aspect of the formulation of the 1988 LCP And "

page 2. "1. That the Development Agreement is consistent with: (a) all Elements of the Orange County General Plan ; and (d) the 1988 Irvine Coast Local Coastal program comprising Land Use Plan and Implementing Action Program, "

page 4. " a. Early construction of four Lanes of Pelican Hills Road;

and at 17. " That the Findings of approval for the Irvine Coast Local Coastal Program as set forth in Exhibit E of the Irvine Coast Development Agreement have determined that the forgoing public benefits not only carry out County policies but also meet significant visitor-serving uses, public access and habitat protection polices of the California Coastal Act."

page 5. (=" (20 from the construction of ultimate capacities of Pelican Hill Road in excess of total project needs, including improving the capacity of portions of Pacific Coast Highway and MacArthur Boulevard, offset the possibility that regional traffic could preempt capacity required by Irvine Coast Development itself."

 

[ FNCD 23 ] Resolution 85-1477. October 15,1985. ' Major Thoroughfare & Bridge Fee Program" .

page. 3 calls out the building fee program. Tolls are not called out. Or approved, at the signing of the Irvine Coast Development Agreement.
[ NCD 1 ] June 9 1988.

8----- The TCA opinion letter, to the A. G. Office March 25, 1994.
[ NCD 30 ] page 4. On October 17, 1988, the County and the city members of the TCA amended the Joint Powers Agreement to exercise the power authorized by the legislature to impose and collect tolls on the Corridor. (See Exhibit 3.) This TCA. misleadingly fraudulent exhibit 3. Showing an altered, 1982 Orange County Resolution.

Is documented in F>>> Below.

This Joint Powers Amendment is late, by date. And dose not alter the earlier completed, Irvine Coast Development Agreement, as notarized on June 9. 1988. And is first by date, and first by law.

The two County Exhibits Resolutions above: 24. and 25. Make it clear The County and Coastal Commission, intended that the Development Agreement, carried the Law and weight of both parties, to insure the mutual Quid Pro Quo of the signed of Development Agreement. And LCP Public mitigation rights as Pelican Hill RD. / Newport Coast Drive. And they cannot be taken by, Politically Legislature police powers.
[ FNCD Notes 24 ] and 23. have more on this issue of first rights.

9----- TCA. gives Fraudulent information in their SEC. Senior Lien Toll Road Revenue Bonds. Official Statement MARCH , 1993. $1,078,629,411.05 [ NCD 28 ] By altering six maps, showing Newport Coast Drive as not a completed road , going from Pacific Coast Highway to MacArthur Boulevard. Text information regarding the existing By-Pass road not correct. And in not clearly calling out, and maps showing the open By-Pass. as an open road, and heavily used. TCA. also dose not put in a Notice, disclosure, regarding the public outcry. News paper story'.
[ NCD 22 ] FEBRUARY 26, 1993. Regarding tolling a open road, built as part of a LCP Development Agreement.

Or the public controversy of tolling, multi million dollar By-Pass Built by the Irvine Company, for A County, and LCP, Development permit opened on November 6, 1991 [ NCD 32 ] Which still is the argument today.

Just slowed up by the Frauds above. And whatever is to discover.

This issue was reported to the A. G. Office in my Opinion response letter in January 8, 1994. [ NCD 20 ]

page 2. shows a list at .CC, Also notified of this starting Fraudulent endeavor.

page's 5. & 6. give the details put together in 1994.

( I was told the Bonds. paid a 05% and were all sold on, opening. Who bought them up on opening, would be a interesting list for comparison.)

SECTIONS

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H
I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P
Q  R  S  T  U  V  W
X  Y  Z