Website © 2014 Ronald Douglas Kennedy. All Rights Reserved. Site designed by Undisclosed
Pelican Hill Road
Irvine Coast Land Use Plan Amendment
Notes on Maps
and Text Exhibits
Pelican Hill Road/Newport Coast Drive OVERVIEW
Proposed Pelican Hill Road Alignment
Road shown going from Pacific Coast Highway to MacArthur Boulevard
The Irvine Company grand opening of Newport Coast Drive
Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA)/Coastal Commission approval of realignment of Ford Rd.
A.G. asking for the CCC approval of TCA putting a Toll on Newport Coast Drive
Thomas map showing how the 73 toll road has consumed Newport Coast Drive, tolls fraudulently collected daily
The EIR graphically shows that a toll booth will be placed at the intersection with Newport Coast Drive (using the old name Pelican Hills Rd.)
December 19, 1980 City Of Newport Beach Transportation Plan Citizens Advisory Committee
May 19, 1987 Draft Environmental Report For Pelican Hill Road Irvine Coast
Cover letter from A.G.’s Office regarding my request for a TCA Exhibit
San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Ramp Transaction Summary, received from the TCA July 27, 2012
Cover letter from A.G.’s Office. This is TCA exhibit 7
January 7, 1994 Gilbert W. Ferguson Assemblyman Seventh District, Newport Beach. regarding his Opinion request.
March 17, 2012 letter to the honorable Dr. Charles Lester, Executive Director, California Coastal Commission
December 9, 1993. Gilbert W. Ferguson, Assemblyman Seventh District, Newport Beach—his first request for an A.G. Opinion
5/13/93 approved, California Coastal Commission: “Revised Proposed Findings”
December 20,1993 from Newport Beach Council Member for Corona Del Mar, writes to the Honorable Dan Lungren, Attorney General
California Coastal Commission letter April 27, 2012
6/26/92—TCA/LSA Associates, Inc.: Irvine Coast CDP (Coastal Development Permit) findings
Capitol Weekly: “The California Coastal Commission—Unrepentant Sinners”
State of California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General: Legal Opinions & Quo Warranto
March 3, 2009 letter from the A.G.’s Office
Letter to Department of Justice, December 4, 2012—still looking for the missing A.G. Maiser report
Orange County Resolution, NO. 82-598 Transportation Corridors Development Policy
Newport Coast Local Coastal Program, Second Amendment, December 3, 1996
Annexation and Development Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company, 11-08-2001
California Coastal Commission, August 18, 1995—Mr. Charles Damm, District Director, from the San Diego office
October 15, 1985. Resolution of The Board Of Supervisors of Orange County, California, Resolution No. 85-1477, Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program
April 20, 1988. Resolution of the Board of Supervisors, Orange County, No. 88-537
April 20, 1988. Resolution of the Board of Supervisors Orange County, Resolution No. 88-538
R. >>> TCA. EXHIBIT, FROM LSA. ASSOCIATES, dated 06/26/92.
[ FNCD 12 ] AS GIVEN TO THE A. G. FOR THE OPINION. CORRECTLY CALL'S OUT, IRVINE COAST DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, ROAD FINDINGS OF JUNE 9,1988. BUT THE TCA STILL DOES NOT FOLLOW THE LCP. FINDINGS, AS CALLED OUT, In there ? >>>
[ FNCD 11 ] Letter from California Coastal Commission CCC. April 27. 2012, regarding my request for the TCA toll road LCP "approval" Finding's for the, San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor, SJHTC.
as the TCA refers to in their A. G. Opinion letter [ NCD 30 ] page 29. " In addition the Corridor has received approvals from over 25 federal, state and local agencies, including the California Coastal Commission". Their letter calls out " consistence certification CC-6392. for construction of the San Joaquin hills Transportation Corridor."
The document I received is "attachment 1 Irvine Coast CDP Findings" page 2. "Orange County Planning Commission Resolution NO. 92-04 findings Coastal Development permit CD92001"
This document is absolutely meaningless in answering my request:
Here the TCA tells the California Coastal Commission. and all other fact checkers, they are aware of the, Irvine Coast Development Agreement County of Orange and Exhibit C. Irvine Coast Local Coastal Plan Findings of Approval and Supporting Documentation, as they call out in.
[ FNCD 12 ]
page 007011. "For instance, the early construction of Pelican Hill Road (now Newport Coast Drive) was cited as a major public access benefit justifying approval of the Coastal Act (1988 LCP Findings, pp.22-24),"
But, there's no authority here in this planning commission, document Findings, for the TCA to Toll the Newport Coast DR. By-Pass road called out in. January 19, 1982. www.NCD # 2. And in [ NCD 1 ] Irvine Coast Development Agreement. June 9, 1988 . Section C. Findings. page 22. " recreational access capacity by connecting inland areas directly to Crystal Cove State Park (see Exhibit 13 in the executive Summary)." This call out is the agreed road map for the by-pass road LCP. traffic mitigation, (See Exhibit 13 in the Executive Summary)." This executive summary is found at [ NCD 4 ] Exhibit 13. " PELICAN HILL ROAD IRVINE COAST LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT", page 22.
TCA toll road, Findings And Declarations" pages 007001- 007015. which the TCA agrees here in their findings, for the SJHTC toll road. on page # 007011. hear the TCA , calls out "Coastal Act (1988 LCP Findings, pp. 22-24)"
the CCC. responded [ FNCD 12 ] to my request May 24, 2012 with Attachment 1. Irvine Coast Findings. LSA Associates, Inc. At bottom date / location information. 06/26/92(1:\TCA901\ATT-TITL.PGS). --- With CCC. page's from 006999 to 007015.
page. 007000. Orange County Planning Commission Resolution No. 92-04 --- Findings Coastal Development Permit CD 92-04.
page 007000 --"2. The project, subject to the specified conditions, is consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code and the Irvine Coast Planned Community / Local Coastal Program regulations." "7. The project will not interfere with the public access and public recreation polices of the California Coastal Act."
page. 007001. "The following"--- "Findings and Declarations" have been prepared to more specifically articulate the manner in which the proposed project is consistent with the polices of the Irvine coast Local Coastal Program (LCP)" --- --- ---" In which the project complies with specific provisions of the Irvine Coast LCP. Accordingly, the following "Findings and declarations" will serve as the factual analysis and conclusions regarding policy consistency and, as , comprise the facts and analysis for the findings of consistency with the Irvine Coast LCP".
page. 007011 "Irvine Coast LCP provisions and the LCP findings also indicate that facilitating public access to Irvine Coast recreational areas and Crystal Cove State Park were central to the approval of the LCP. For instance, the early construction of Pelican Hill Road (now Newport Coast Drive) was cited as a major public access benefit justifying approval of the Coastal Act (1988 LCP Findings, 22 - 24 )."
The TCA is stating they agree and honor the "Irvine Coast Development Agreement June 9, 1988" and " EXHIBIT C Irvine Coast Local Coastal Plan Findings Of approval And Supporting Documentation". [ NCD 1 ] , the above page call out of page 22 - 24 is in exhibit C. and also refers to "(see exhibit 13 in the Executive summary)." This is the colored By-Pass road map of were Pelican Hill RD/Newport Coast Drive and was agreed to be by, all parties at this time, in June of 1988
Exhibit C. LCP. Coastal Finding, are still in full force. As public amendment, notice and hearings to alter/change the Irvine Coast Development Agreement. traffic mitigation's Finding, were never held.
The executive summary Map can be found at [ NCD 4 ] page 22. showing the Colored Road Map.
The Irvine Company TIC. willingly: Designed, Built, This free By-Pass road with there own Dollars, and opened it as a free road on November 15, 1991. [ NCD 32 ]
page 007012 TCA here Clearly states for the, CCC fact checkers and general public readers, information, regarding to this project by the TCA, they make the following statement. In their findings they make for their LCP permit.
"The highway improvements and phasing as defined in this Section E [ which includes specific reference to SJHTC]"
The TCA have a CCC LCP Findings Permit. For a Highway as they call out here in their own paid for findings. They liberally use the abbreviation SJHTC on page's 00702 to 007015 . And at page 007012
"The highway improvements and phasing as defined in this Section E [which includes specific reference to the SJHTC] and on exhibit Q, which are required by this LCP"
The SJHTC. As also found in [ NCD 1 ] "Irvine Coast Development Agreement County Of Orange" June 9 1988. page ( i ) at 2.3.1. "transportation Improvements" calls out page 12. Pelican Hill Road Transportation Improvements. Pelican Hill Road. At ( i ) "bypass route around Corona Del Mar".
These received TCA Findings from the CCC. File on the SJHTC. Just do not call out a Toll Road in their Findings. But do call out a Highway. as the SJHTC CORRIDOR plans show in June of 1988. Also this is not a CCC. LCP. amendment to the Irvine Coast original Findings of 1988. Nothing is: amended or changed by the California Coastal Commission, giving the TCA a LCP permit. As based on these TCA. Findings. As the TCA Opinion letter tries to imply, in calling out the same findings. And agreeing with in the original, 1988 Irvine Coast Development Agreement, Findings.
The only way the above would read positive, is that the Planning commission, believed at this time the TCA Corridor, and Newport Coast Drive. Were two separate roads. That's what I believe they were saying in 1992, on reading their work now.
S. >>> A .G. OPINION # 93 - 1205. APPROVING the TOLL ON NEWPORT COAST DR. WAS CONCEIVED IN FRAUD, AND IS FLAWED IN IT'S SHAM, OPINION RULING. REGARDING THE LCP FINDING'S. FOR THE IRVINE COAST DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. JUN 9, 1988. NOW A CONTRACT FOR ALL PARTIES. AND THE PUBLIC IS THE PARTY, DEMANDING IT'S FREE ROAD RIGHT'S. <<<
This A. G. Opinion, dismisses the LCP Findings for BY-PASS Road mitigation, in foot note 7. bottom of page 6. [ NCD A ] by citing, " The commission's staff has determined that placing a toll booth at Newport
...continued, page 4