Website © 2014 Ronald Douglas Kennedy. All Rights Reserved.                                             Site designed by Undisclosed

Exhibit 13

Pelican Hill Road

Irvine Coast Land Use Plan Amendment

Home SECTION I SECTION II, Items B,C,D SECTION III, Items N,O,P SECTION IV--Map & Text Notes

QUICK LINKS

SECTIONS

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H
I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P
Q  R  S  T  U  V  W
X  Y  Z

Notes on Maps
and Text Exhibits

click here

Requires FREE
Adobe Reader

 

MAPS

[Map 1]

Pelican Hill Road/Newport Coast Drive OVERVIEW

[Maps 2A & 2B]

Proposed Pelican Hill Road Alignment

[Map 3]

Road shown going from Pacific Coast Highway to MacArthur Boulevard

[Map 4]

The Irvine Company grand opening of Newport Coast Drive

[Map 5]

Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA)/Coastal Commission approval of realignment of Ford Rd.

[Letter 5B-1 & 5B-2]

[Letter 5C-1–5C-3]

A.G. asking for the CCC approval of TCA putting a Toll on Newport Coast Drive

[Map 6]

Thomas map showing how the 73 toll road has consumed Newport Coast Drive, tolls fraudulently collected daily

[Map 7]

The EIR graphically shows that a toll booth will be placed at the intersection with Newport Coast Drive (using the old name Pelican Hills Rd.)

 

TEXT

[FNCD 1]

December 19, 1980 City Of Newport Beach Transportation Plan Citizens Advisory Committee

[FNCD 2]

May 19, 1987 Draft Environmental Report For Pelican Hill Road Irvine Coast

[FNCD 3]

Cover letter from A.G.’s Office regarding my request for a TCA Exhibit

[FNCD 4]

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Ramp Transaction Summary, received from the TCA July 27, 2012

[FNCD 5]

Cover letter from A.G.’s Office. This is TCA exhibit 7

[FNCD 6]

January 7, 1994 Gilbert W. Ferguson Assemblyman Seventh District, Newport Beach. regarding his Opinion request.

[FNCD 7]

March 17, 2012 letter to the honorable Dr. Charles Lester, Executive Director, California Coastal Commission

[FNCD 8]

December 9, 1993. Gilbert W. Ferguson, Assemblyman Seventh District, Newport Beach—his first request for an A.G. Opinion

[FNCD 9]

5/13/93 approved, California Coastal Commission: “Revised Proposed Findings”

[FNCD 10]

December 20,1993 from Newport Beach Council Member for Corona Del Mar, writes to the Honorable Dan Lungren, Attorney General

[FNCD 11]

California Coastal Commission letter April 27, 2012

[FNCD 12]

6/26/92—TCA/LSA Associates, Inc.: Irvine Coast CDP (Coastal Development Permit) findings

[FNCD 13]

A.G. Conflicts-of-interest

[FNCD 14]

Capitol Weekly: “The California Coastal Commission—Unrepentant Sinners”

[FNCD 15]

State of California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General: Legal Opinions & Quo Warranto

[FNCD 16]

March 3, 2009 letter from the A.G.’s Office

[FNCD 17]

 

[FNCD 18]

Letter to Department of Justice, December 4, 2012—still looking for the missing A.G. Maiser report

[FNCD 19]

Orange County Resolution, NO. 82-598 Transportation Corridors Development Policy

[FNCD 20]

Newport Coast Local Coastal Program, Second Amendment, December 3, 1996

[FNCD 21]

Annexation and Development Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company, 11-08-2001

[FNCD 22]

California Coastal Commission, August 18, 1995—Mr. Charles Damm, District Director, from the San Diego office

[FNCD 23]

October 15, 1985. Resolution of The Board Of Supervisors of Orange County, California, Resolution No. 85-1477, Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program

[FNCD 24]

April 20, 1988. Resolution of the Board of Supervisors, Orange County, No. 88-537

[FNCD 25]

April 20, 1988. Resolution of the Board of Supervisors Orange County, Resolution No. 88-538

SECTION IV, page 2

TEXT NOTES, continued

The Irvine Company agreed to build Pelican Hill / Newport Coast drive. And dedicate land for the Transportation Quarter.  In the Irvine Coast Development Agreement June 9, 1988 [ NCD 1 ]

And dedicated to the County of Orange. As a condition of the Irvine Coastal LCP Development Agreement in [ NCD 5A ] August 22. 1988. Note page 13.  " 949 EFFECTS OF LEGAL ACTION PREVENTING DEVELOPMENT."  --- "if offerer  is prevented from developing its coastal development under the Irvine Coast Local Coastal Program"

The TCA States they had the right to Toll On October 17, 1988.
[ NCD 30 ] page 4.

But the land for the Toll Corridor was not transferred to the TCA for tolling till, March 16, 1993. [ NCD 5 B] page 4.  bottom right Tolls, "

[ FNCD Notes 5 ]  Cover letter from A. G. Office. This TCA exhibit 7. shows "Figure 2.5" the TCA snake eyed line in there EIS to build a toll road.

TCA Lawyers at [ NCD 30 ] page 21. States " " The EIR graphically shows that toll booths will be placed at the intersections with Newport Coast Drive (Pelican Hills Road). Figure 2.5 " The EIR/EIS notice of tolling was reduced down to this figure 2.5 line drawing only. No text of what they were  specifically asking to toll. In this case a Open Public Road.

-------------more information at Map 7. and Frauds page 5. at 3. and At page 12. G.... Fraudulent EIS Misinformation.

Note: the 1992 Proposed Construction of State route 73. Is called out as a EIS.  not a  EIR as TCA states.  [ NCD 25 ] TCA. EIS.

[ FNCD 6 ]  January 7, 1994 Gilbert W. Ferguson Assemblyman Seventh District, Newport Beach.  Regarding his Opinion request. " The matters in question are:

His letter has eight question to, be answered.  The A. G. office in San Diego fraudulently alters the Assemblyman's request as shown here.

The San Diego office sends out his request to the public for comment, now on their own letterhead. February 10, 1994. [ NCD 17 ] "We have received a revised request from Assemblyman Gilbert Ferguson for an opinion of the Attorney General on the following questions: "  The A. G. now is only showing seven questions. question eight regarding, The question of frauds has fraudulent been deleted. And the Assemblyman's question Two is altered in meaning by fraudulently deleting  "by both the county and the California State Coastal Commission and subsequently"  Here the head Lawyers for the California Coastal Commission,  delete the question regarding their legal client.  Verses public right's, as called out in the Irvine Coast Development Agreement County of Orange, recorded June 9, 1988. exhibit C. "Irvine Coast Local Coastal Plan Findings Of Approval And Supporting Documents" and  " Irvine COAST Development Agreement Exhibit D. Benefits To the County and ITS Residents"

------more information at  P.>>>  page 17.

[ FNCD 7 ]  March 17, 2012 letter to, The honorable, Dr. Charles Lester, Executive Director, California Coastal Commission. Informing the new Director, to the failure to date to enforce  the Irvine Coast Development Agreement, And  the Local Coastal Plan, Findings. And frauds known to date.  Never answered.

[ FNCD 8 ]  December 9, 1993. Gilbert W. Ferguson Assemblyman Seventh District, Newport Beach.  His first request for an A. G. Opinion, Giving background of his request, I did the rebuttal for this hearing after TCA lawyer made the first presentation. I presented Coastal Commission , and County of Orange Documentation. Reading short points of fact's out loud. On finishing MR. Ferguson asked the TCA Lawyer if the Documentation was true. There was no answer given, he rose, turned his back on the Assemblyman, and walked out of the room. Ferguson rose and asked Olivia Maiser, Special Assistant to Attorney General Dan Lungren. for an Opinion. Her report is missing now.

----more information at  N.>>> page 16. A. G. & TCA. Anomalies. At Assemblyman Ferguson Pacific Club meeting.  and at O.>>> Ms Olivia Maiser, Special Assistant To Attorney General Dan Lungren.

[ FNCD 9 ]  5/13/93 approved,  California Coastal Commission. "Revised Proposed Findings" --"Construction of the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor"

page 11. "The County of Orange's LCP has not been certified by the Commission, but has not been incorporated into the CCMP."

" F. Applicant's Consistency Certification. TCA has Certified. That the proposed activity complies with California's approved coastal management program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such program. Just a fraudulent lie.

But in fact: the TCA has violated the, Irvine Coast Development Agreement. County of Orange, June 9, 1988 . LCP and LCP. Finding.  [ NCD 1 ]  Section's, C. and D.

[ FNCD 10 ]  December 20., 1993 From Newport Beach Council Member, for Corona Del Mar, writes to the Honorable Dan Lungren, Attorney General. regarding the malfeasance, and attitude in dealing with the TCA.

Letter from the Harbor View Hills South Homeowners Association  Yvonne Houssels, to Mayor John Hedges and City Council, Asking the city council to revisit the Newport Coast Drive Toll issue again.

----------more on this at J. >>>> page 14.

[ FNCD 11 ]  California Coastal Commission. Letter April 27. 2012

Note how the "Writ of Mandate 2,200 pages, Mandamus. has effect the Public Right to a free LCP.  By-Pass,  Newport Coast Drive, is not understood at this writing. As it is filed at the California Coastal commission, Or why their Head Lawyers the California Attorney General Office. Has not enforced the public's right's against the TCA. In not following the LCP.  Irvine Coast Development Agreement County Of Orange. Section C. and D. June 9. 1988. [ NCD 1 ]  It is a $ 50,000,000. + Fraud. And being repeated daily.

[ FNCD 12 ]  6/26/92 TCA  LSA Associates, Inc. Irvine Coast CDP [Coastal Development Permit] Findings.

page 007000. Orange County Planning Commission Resolution NO. 92-04 Findings Coastal Development Permit CD 92001.

--- 2.  " The project, subject to the specified conditions, is consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Code and the Irvine Coast Planned Community / Local Coastal Program regulations.

---  7. "The project will not interfere with public access and public recreation policies of the California Coastal Act."

page 007001 at top  " project is consistent with the policies of the of the Irvine Coast Local Coastal Program (LCP) "  ----- " Findings of consistency with the Irvine Coast LCP."

page 007007. " (5) the fact that the LCP specifically requires the approval of development for the SQHTC alignment and Sand Canyon connection with the SJHTC in conjunction with a permit satisfying development mitigation requirements set forth in the LCP"

page 007011 " Irvine Coast LCP provisions and the LCP findings also indicate that facilitating public access to Irvine Coast recreational areas and to Crystal Cove State Parks were Central to the approval of the LCP. For instance, the early construction of Pelican Hill Road  now Newport Coast Drive) was cited as a major public access benefit justifying approval of the Coastal Act 9 1988 LCP Findings, pp. 22-24). The same counter-traffic flows of recreational and commute uses cited in the 1988 LCP Findings on behalf of Pelican Hill Road apply equally to the SHTC and to Sand Canyon Avenue.

Note: pp. 22-24 is in  the, Irvine Coast Development Agreement  
[ NCD 1 ] Findings is in, Section C. Irvine Coast Local Coastal Plan. page 22. calls out, "See Exhibit 13 in the (Executive Summary) and this is found at [ NCD 4 ] " The Irvine Coast Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment, Executive Summary, March 1987."

...continued, page 3

SECTIONS

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H
I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P
Q  R  S  T  U  V  W
X  Y  Z