Website © 2014 Ronald Douglas Kennedy. All Rights Reserved.                                             Site designed by Undisclosed

Exhibit 13

Pelican Hill Road

Irvine Coast Land Use Plan Amendment

Home SECTION I SECTION II, Items B,C,D SECTION III, Items N,O,P SECTION IV--Map & Text Notes

QUICK LINKS

SECTIONS

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H
I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P
Q  R  S  T  U  V  W
X  Y  Z

Notes on Maps
and Text Exhibits

click here

Requires FREE
Adobe Reader

 

MAPS

[Map 1]

Pelican Hill Road/Newport Coast Drive OVERVIEW

[Maps 2A & 2B]

Proposed Pelican Hill Road Alignment

[Map 3]

Road shown going from Pacific Coast Highway to MacArthur Boulevard

[Map 4]

The Irvine Company grand opening of Newport Coast Drive

[Map 5]

Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA)/Coastal Commission approval of realignment of Ford Rd.

[Letter 5B-1 & 5B-2]

[Letter 5C-1–5C-3]

A.G. asking for the CCC approval of TCA putting a Toll on Newport Coast Drive

[Map 6]

Thomas map showing how the 73 toll road has consumed Newport Coast Drive, tolls fraudulently collected daily

[Map 7]

The EIR graphically shows that a toll booth will be placed at the intersection with Newport Coast Drive (using the old name Pelican Hills Rd.)

 

TEXT

[FNCD 1]

December 19, 1980 City Of Newport Beach Transportation Plan Citizens Advisory Committee

[FNCD 2]

May 19, 1987 Draft Environmental Report For Pelican Hill Road Irvine Coast

[FNCD 3]

Cover letter from A.G.’s Office regarding my request for a TCA Exhibit

[FNCD 4]

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Ramp Transaction Summary, received from the TCA July 27, 2012

[FNCD 5]

Cover letter from A.G.’s Office. This is TCA exhibit 7

[FNCD 6]

January 7, 1994 Gilbert W. Ferguson Assemblyman Seventh District, Newport Beach. regarding his Opinion request.

[FNCD 7]

March 17, 2012 letter to the honorable Dr. Charles Lester, Executive Director, California Coastal Commission

[FNCD 8]

December 9, 1993. Gilbert W. Ferguson, Assemblyman Seventh District, Newport Beach—his first request for an A.G. Opinion

[FNCD 9]

5/13/93 approved, California Coastal Commission: “Revised Proposed Findings”

[FNCD 10]

December 20,1993 from Newport Beach Council Member for Corona Del Mar, writes to the Honorable Dan Lungren, Attorney General

[FNCD 11]

California Coastal Commission letter April 27, 2012

[FNCD 12]

6/26/92—TCA/LSA Associates, Inc.: Irvine Coast CDP (Coastal Development Permit) findings

[FNCD 13]

A.G. Conflicts-of-interest

[FNCD 14]

Capitol Weekly: “The California Coastal Commission—Unrepentant Sinners”

[FNCD 15]

State of California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General: Legal Opinions & Quo Warranto

[FNCD 16]

March 3, 2009 letter from the A.G.’s Office

[FNCD 17]

 

[FNCD 18]

Letter to Department of Justice, December 4, 2012—still looking for the missing A.G. Maiser report

[FNCD 19]

Orange County Resolution, NO. 82-598 Transportation Corridors Development Policy

[FNCD 20]

Newport Coast Local Coastal Program, Second Amendment, December 3, 1996

[FNCD 21]

Annexation and Development Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company, 11-08-2001

[FNCD 22]

California Coastal Commission, August 18, 1995—Mr. Charles Damm, District Director, from the San Diego office

[FNCD 23]

October 15, 1985. Resolution of The Board Of Supervisors of Orange County, California, Resolution No. 85-1477, Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program

[FNCD 24]

April 20, 1988. Resolution of the Board of Supervisors, Orange County, No. 88-537

[FNCD 25]

April 20, 1988. Resolution of the Board of Supervisors Orange County, Resolution No. 88-538

SECTION IV, page 1

 

NOTES—Free Newport Coast Drive Maps and Text Exhibits

 

Dated after June 9, 1988.
Does not amend the original:
Orange County & LCP Findings for the
Irvine Coast Development Agreement

 

MAP NOTES

[ Map Notes 1 ]  March 1987 The Irvine Company,  by-pass road offer for LCP. and County of Orange, Development Permit's. This is called out in numerous planning documents as see "Exhibit 13". Connecting  PCH. and MacArthur Boulevard. As the By-Pass.  [ NCD 4 ]

 

[ Map Notes 2 ]  May 19, 1987. map's 2 A. & 2 B. are shown hear. 2 A. Proposed Pelican Hill Road Alignment. Later renamed Newport Coast DR.

 2. B. Existing Jurisdictional boundaries, Sphere's of political influences. [ FNCD 2 ]

 

[ Map Notes 3 ]  January 19, 1982. Irvine Coast, Planned Community Development Plan, "Land Use Plan  for the Irvine Coast LCP. Road shown going from Pacific Coast Highway to MacArthur Boulevard.  [ NCD 2 ]

 

[ Map Notes 4 ]  November 16, 1991. The Irvine Company grand opening of Newport Coast Drive, [ NCD 32 ] shows -- See Road Back Page

"Newport Coast Drive, which winds from Pacific Coast Highway just south of Cameo Shores to MacArthur Blvd."

 

[ Map Notes 5 ]  Front page 5-A  top 5 -13-93. Applicant Transportation Corridor Agencies (TCA) Coastal Commission approval of " Realignment of Ford Rd.'"-- "(less than one half miles south of Newport Coast Drive)"

 

next page Map 5. shows exhibit 2. CC-25-93 Figure 1. The TCA is showing to the CC. California Coastal Commission, The San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor, an Newport Coast Drive as TWO separate roads. Letter  

 

[ Map Notes 5 C 1 ]  A. G. Office September 5, 2007. Asking for the the CCC  approval of TCA putting a Toll on Newport Coast Drive. "we do not have any records within our control or custody responsive to your request."  The A. G. opinion No 93-1205  May 12 1994. Dismiss any LCP, Mitigation public free  By-Pass rights. in there Opinion [ NCD A ] on page 6. by citing an unnamed "Commission's Staff."

 

But in March 23, 2009.  I receive a PDF  file from the A. G. Office., with a letter from Assemblyman Ferguson January 7, 1994, asking for an Opinion. Question two calling out the " California State Coastal Commission".  [ FNCD 6 ]

But the A. G. Office in there public letter February 10, 1994. " We have received a revised request from Assemblyman Gilbert Ferguson for an Opinion" Here Question two is missing his wording "California State Coastal Commission". [ NCD 17 ] and all of Question eight regarding FRAUD is deleted, the rest is word for word?

But now in the A. G Opinion May 12, 1994. page six, footnote seven, the A. G. puts the, administration back on the Coastal Commission. The Assemblyman was asking the A. G. to research this point, regarding fraud. Being the A. G. Office is also head Lawyers for the State Coastal Commission, they just put out a covering fraudulent  A. G Opinion. On reading documentation received I still have not found how the TCA. has a legal  right to toll Newport Coast Drive?

[ FNCD 24 ] and [ FNCD 25 ] County of Orange Resolutions, both call a direct tie with County, and California Coastal Commission, both agreeing the Irvine Coast Development Agreement of June 9. Is what the equally agree is the LCP Call Out. [ FNCD 25 Notes ] Gives further detail on OC. & CCC. Agreement, regarding public, benefits derived by the LCP and County, Finding's.

 

[ Map Notes 6 ]  Received from TCA July 27 2012. Thomas map showing how the 73 toll road has consumed Newport Coast Drive, and living of tolls collected daily, in this "daily renewing tolling fraud".

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Ramp Transaction Summary, Newport Coast Ramp: total, at above date $49,672,107.00  [ FNCD 4 ] .

 

[ Map Notes 7 ]  This, snake eyed map. "Toll Plaza Locations Figure 2.5" is the only: indication, notice. That a toll was planed by the TCA for a section of Newport Coast Drive. I totally missed the desire by TCA to take, and toll, Newport Coast Drive. I received this map from the A. G. Office August 20,2012. [ FNCD 5 ] Page 21, at 1. Notices of TCA Consideration of EIR [ it actually is a Federal EIS. rdk ] and Approval  of Toll Road. "The EIR graphically shows that a toll booth will be placed at the intersection with Newport Coast Drive" [ it actually called out the old name Pelican Hills RD. rdk. ].

 

I actually read this voluminous 'Final Environmental Impact Statement" EIS. [ NCD 25 ] till I read on page K-3

 

" the corridor is consistent with the approved LCPs for Aliso Creek, Irvine Coast," In reading this I was assured the TCA was following the, Irvine Coast Development Agreement County of Orange,  Exhibit C. Irvine Coast Local Coastal Plan Findings Of Approval And Supporting Documentation, and Exhibit D.  Irvine Coast Development Agreement , Benefits secured as Conditions Of Approval Of The Development Agreement. As recorded June 9, 1988  [ NCD 1 ]

 

TEXT NOTES

[ FNCD Notes1 ]  December 19, 1980 City Of Newport Beach Transportation Plan Citizens Advisory Committee. As a resident of Corona Del Mar, I was appointed by my Councilman  to this position. Traffic on PCH at this time was starting to be a residential  problem, My suggestion below, and the efforts of the Irvine Company and other community leaders lead to the successful, Irvine Coast LCP Development Agreement in June,1988. Calling out the By-Pass Road. The road opened as promised and  community traffic flowed on PCH. Till the TCA decided to Toll, and  their player's engaged in dissembling of information.

[ FNCD Notes 2 ]  May 19, 1987 Draft Environmental Report For Pelican Hill Road Irvine Coast.  Two by-pass road maps. Proposed, Alignment and Existing Jurisdictional Boundaries.  LCP called out on page's:  4, 121, and 125.  Freeway called out page 6, Highway called out on  page's 7. and 125. Tolling was not planned at this time.  Page 125 " Pelican Hill Road is a Condition of approval for the Local Coastal Plan. The project is consistent with the Master Plan of Arterial Highways,"  

[ FNCD  Notes 3 ]  Cover letter from A. G. Office regarding my request for a TCA Exhibit as cited  in their Opinion letter to the A. G. Explaining their planning  right's in tolling Newport Coast Drive. [ NCD 30 ] page 4. stating  out  " On October 17,1988, the County and the city members of the TCA amended the Joint Powers Agreement to exercise the power authorized by the Legislature to impose and collect tolls on the Corridor. (See Exhibit 3,)  Reading this  TCA. exhibit 3. as received from the A. G. there’s problems in tractability of dating part's of it, and where some of the map pages originally came from.  And a glaring Fraud of a Orange County  Board of Supervisors Resolution, towards the back at page - 29 -. The front page of this two page, early April 21, 1982.  resolution No 82-598 Shown hear as  EXHIBIT  ll  [two]  a part of this large single TCA Exhibit # 3. of there supposed rights, for tolling. The original 1982 Resolution is not marked as  Exhibit ll. Also it is a three page exhibit, not a two page exhibit as received, from the A. G. Office. A fresh certified copy of this exhibit is at [ FNCD 19 ]

----more information on this deleted page importance is at Frauds page 6.  at----- 5. second paragraph.  And at F.>>> page 11. TCA. Produced Fraudulent Document, ---

[ FNCD Notes 4 ]  San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency Ramp Transaction Summary, received from the TCA July 27, 2012. For Tolls collected on  " Newport Coast Ramp: " $ 49,672,107.00 This number is over a year old and a current Dollar amount is most likely around  51 or 52 Million Dollars. The TCA refused to give me a update, of their , dollar fraud total.

...continued, page 2

SECTIONS

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H
I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P
Q  R  S  T  U  V  W
X  Y  Z